Leslie is an assistant professor going through tenure review with significant pressure to publish. IThenticate’s paper begins with this hypothetical scenario: Misrepresentation in ‘The Ethics of Self-Plagiarism’ (IThenticate’s parent company, Turnitin, was sold last year for an estimated $1.75 billion.) Given this clear conflict of interest, the academic community should know exactly what this document says, as well as what it is: a misrepresentation of the realities and ethics of academic research - and a guide that leads to worse, not better, writing. While iThenticate’s paper may be perceived as an authoritative guide, it is also the product of a for-profit plagiarism-detection business with a virtual monopoly across academe, scholarly publishing and government. The document also appears cited in multiple educational columns, editorials and author guidelines of scientific journals. Its influence has extended to graduate schools’ Responsible Conduct of Research training materials, university library guidelines on plagiarism, ethical guidelines of scholarly societies, educational blogs and even an Albanian government policy paper. Interestingly - and, as it turns out, problematically - one of the most widely accessed guides is iThenticate’s own 2011 white paper “ The Ethics of Self-Plagiarism.” In a Google search for “self-plagiarism” we conducted this past August, iThenticate’s paper was the second hit out of 310,000.
#ITHENTICATE اکانت رایگان HOW TO#
In such situations, iThenticate-generated reports could help researchers not just to discover problems but also to facilitate learning regarding what is and is not considered acceptable practice.īut for authors looking for guidance on how to reuse their previously published material appropriately, resources are limited. Further, because authors might draft different parts of an article, a principal investigator may not notice if a co-author has reused material in ways that they would deem inappropriate. Some junior researchers may not yet have learned the norms for reusing materials in their discipline, and even experienced researchers may have different sensibilities about what’s appropriate when it comes to reuse. While publishers expect each paper to offer a novel and substantive advance over previous work, STEM researchers often have reason to repeat some details from their earlier papers, such as definitions, overviews of previous research or methodological details.Īnother difference is that STEM research articles usually have multiple authors - various combinations of faculty members, graduate students, research faculty members and postdocs. One difference is that research progresses in incremental steps through multiple closely related publications. But the situation is different in science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields. To humanities scholars, this situation might seem nonsensical you wouldn’t need a computer to tell you if you’d plagiarized another writer or inappropriately reused your own material.
Now that Duke had adopted the software, those in attendance were encouraged to use it to check their manuscripts and grants for plagiarism and self-plagiarism prior to submission. Many scientific journals and major granting agencies, we were told, are also using iThenticate. A dean from the graduate school then spoke about the plagiarism-detection platform iThenticate, which compares submitted papers against published papers and identifies passages that are identical or nearly so.
It began with an overview that included material on self-plagiarism: the reuse of an author’s previously published material. The Thesis Originality Report will be taken by the supervisor of the student.In 2019, the Office of Scientific Integrity at our institution, Duke University, held a town hall meeting on plagiarism. Our academicians who want to use the program should contact with their "title, department, name, surname, telephone and e-mail” for their access identifications.Īccording to Article D1 of the Law on the Launching and Implementation of the Graduate Education Program, which is determined by the Council of Higher Education, the Thesis Originality Report must be submitted to the institute and defense jury members before the Thesis Defense Examination. Important: In order to open a user account according to the contract signed between iThenticate and Ulakbim, it is necessary to have a minimum of PhD degree. System should not be used for thesis, homework etc. IThenticate was opened by TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM to our university for the purpose of detecting plagiarism only in academic studies.